Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Wapinzani 'Sauzi' wapania kumng'oa Rais Zuma

The decision by opposition parties to band together in a vote of no confidence against Jacob Zuma highlights a growing frustration with Parliament.
Opposition parties in Parliament are already considering a Plan B in the event that the ANC turns down a request for a debate to resolve a vote of no confidence in the leadership of President Jacob Zuma.
 
Opposition parties in Parliament are already considering a Plan B in the event that the ANC turns down a request for a debate to resolve a vote of no confidence in the leadership of President Jacob Zuma.
Last week eight political parties banded together to file a motion of no confidence against Zuma, citing the Marikana killings, the Nkandla renovations, the Limpopo textbook saga, successive economic downgrades, and disrespect for the Constitution, among others, as their reasons.

The ANC has called the motion a “narrow publicity seeking gimmick” but the DA, Cope and the IFP have asked for a date for the debate to be scheduled on Thursday morning. They’ve also asked that a vote be taken at the end of the debate by secret ballot.

Such a debate will only be scheduled if agreed to by either the Chief Whips’ Forum or the Programming Committee which sets the agenda for each day. 

With the ANC in the majority, the party essentially has the final say in whether the discussion ever makes it to the floor.

But Paul Graham, executive director of the Institute for Democracy in Africa, said proposing a motion of no confidence in a president is legitimate political activity.

Graham said the motion suggests “a frustration with Parliament and the president, that matters of concern to opposition parties and by extension to almost one in every three voting adults are not being given sufficient weight by the governing party”.

“Personally I would like to see a rational, hard talking debate in Parliament about the state of the nation and the performance of the president,” he said.

“That the motion will fail is self-evident. But that does not mean it is not an important moment in our democratic life.”

The parties are under no illusions about the prospects of the motion being debated in Parliament.

IFP chief whip Koos Van Der Merwe said that the fate of the motion lay with the ANC, which has a majority in Parliament. “If they want to let a motion through or they want to kill a motion, they do it. It’s as simple as that,” he said.

“Parliament and politics are in a state of paralysis because of Mangaung,” said Van Der Merwe. “Do you think the ANC will want to open this can of worms a month before Mangaung?”

Cope acting whip Juli Kilian agreed that there was little hope the debate would actually happen.

“We’re going to go into the chief whips' forum [on Wednesday], and it’s going to be a huge fight, then we’re going to the programming committee on Thursday and its going to be another huge fight,” she said.

“We’re not going to accept that they’re just not going to debate it.”

Kilian said that if the ANC was going to “abuse their majority to filibuster to get to the end of their term without a debate”, the parties would consider taking the debate forward outside of Parliament.

With the final sitting for the year looming at the end of next week, it seems Parliament is set to close with a bit of drama.

Mail&Guardian

No comments:

Post a Comment